Skip to content

AWS OpenSearch vs Pinecone: Service Comparison Guide

Overview

This guide compares two powerful vector search technologies that help computers understand meaning, not just match exact words. Whether you're a curious student, a developer building AI applications, or a technical architect choosing the right tool, this guide has you covered.

📖 Reading Guide:

  • Basic sections - Perfect for beginners and understanding core concepts
  • Intermediate sections - For developers and technical decision-makers
  • Advanced sections - Deep technical details for specialists and architects

Skip the technical sections if they're too complex - you'll still understand which tool fits your needs!

Imagine you're looking for similar songs to one you like. Instead of just matching song titles, a smart system would understand that:

  • "Bohemian Rhapsody" by Queen is similar to other epic rock ballads
  • "Hotel California" by Eagles shares musical themes with classic rock stories
  • Even if the titles share no common words!

Vector search works similarly - it converts text, images, or other data into mathematical representations (vectors) that capture meaning, then finds similar items based on that mathematical similarity.

The Competitors

AWS OpenSearch is like a Swiss Army knife - it's a powerful search engine that can do traditional text search, analytics, AND vector search. It's part of Amazon's cloud services. For comprehensive technical details about OpenSearch's vector search capabilities, algorithms, and implementation patterns, see the OpenSearch Technical Guide.

Pinecone is like a specialized precision instrument - it's built specifically and only for vector search, making it incredibly good at that one thing.

The Key Difference

  • OpenSearch: "I can do vector search plus many other search tasks"
  • Pinecone: "I do vector search better than anyone, and that's all I focus on"

Core Vector Search Capabilities: Head-to-Head Comparison

Understanding the Technical Terms

Before we dive in, let's decode some key concepts:

Vector Dimensions: Think of this like describing a person - you might use height, weight, age, income, etc. More dimensions = more detailed description. In vector search, more dimensions usually mean better accuracy but require more computing power.

Similarity Metrics: Different ways to measure "how similar" two things are:

  • Cosine: Like measuring the angle between two arrows (good for text)
  • Euclidean: Like measuring straight-line distance on a map (good for images)
  • Dot Product: Like measuring both direction and magnitude (good for recommendations)
Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone 🤔 What This Means
Vector Search k-NN with HNSW, IVF algorithms Proprietary optimized algorithms OpenSearch: Uses standard, proven methods (details). Pinecone: Uses custom-built, specialized methods
Vector Dimensions Up to 16,000 dimensions Up to 20,000 dimensions Both handle very detailed data representations. Pinecone handles slightly more complex data
Similarity Metrics Cosine, Euclidean, Inner Product Cosine, Euclidean, Dot Product Both offer the main similarity measurement methods you'd need
Hybrid Search Vector + full-text search Vector + metadata filtering OpenSearch: Can combine meaning-based and keyword search (details). Pinecone: Combines meaning-based search with data filters
RAG Support Full RAG implementation capabilities Vector retrieval for RAG pipelines OpenSearch: Complete RAG ecosystem (guide). Pinecone: Specialized vector retrieval component
Real-time Updates Supported with small delay Real-time with immediate consistency OpenSearch: Few seconds delay after updates. Pinecone: Instant availability after updates
Approximate Search HNSW, IVF approximate algorithms Proprietary approximate algorithms Both use "good enough" fast search instead of perfect but slow search
Exact Search Brute force option available Not optimized for exact search OpenSearch: Can do perfect matching (slow). Pinecone: Focuses on fast approximate matching

Real-World Example: Netflix-Style Recommendation System

Let's say you're building a movie recommendation system:

With OpenSearch:

  • Store movie data: title, plot summary, genre, cast, user reviews
  • Create vectors from plot summaries and reviews (captures movie "meaning")
  • User searches: "funny romantic comedies with strong female leads"
  • System combines:
  • Text search: finds movies with those exact keywords
  • Vector search: finds movies semantically similar
  • Result: Both keyword matches and movies with similar themes but different words

With Pinecone:

  • Store movie vectors (mathematical representations of movie characteristics)
  • User's viewing history becomes a user vector
  • System finds: movies with vectors similar to user's preference vector
  • Result: Movies that "feel" similar to what the user likes, even if completely different genres

Architecture and Deployment

Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
Deployment Model Self-managed or AWS managed Fully managed SaaS
Infrastructure EC2 instances, customizable Serverless, auto-scaling
Multi-region Manual setup required Built-in multi-region support
High Availability Master/data node configuration Built-in with automatic failover
Backup/Recovery Manual snapshots required Automatic backups included
Maintenance OS patches, updates required Zero maintenance required

Scalability and Performance

Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
Horizontal Scaling Manual node addition Automatic scaling
Index Size Limited by cluster resources Up to billions of vectors
Query Latency 10-100ms (varies by config) Sub-10ms typical
Throughput (QPS) Thousands of QPS Thousands to millions of QPS
Storage Type EBS, instance storage Proprietary storage system
Memory Requirements High for vector operations Optimized memory usage

Data Management

Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
Data Ingestion Bulk API, streaming REST API, batch upserts
Update Operations Update, upsert, delete Upsert, delete, partial updates
Data Format JSON documents with vectors Vectors with metadata
Schema Flexibility Dynamic mapping Metadata-only schema
Indexing Speed Moderate (configurable) Optimized for fast indexing
Data Durability Replica configuration Built-in durability

Query Capabilities

Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
Vector Queries k-NN, approximate search Similarity search, filtering
Text Search Full-text search capabilities No native text search
Complex Filtering Advanced query DSL Metadata filtering
Aggregations Full aggregation support Limited aggregation
Geospatial Geo-point, geo-shape queries No native geo support
Time Series Time-based queries, rollups Basic timestamp filtering

Integration and Ecosystem

Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
ML Frameworks Manual integration required Native integrations (LangChain, etc.)
APIs REST, various client libraries REST API, Python/Node.js SDKs
Authentication IAM, SAML, basic auth API keys, SAML SSO
Monitoring CloudWatch, custom dashboards Built-in monitoring dashboard
Alerting Custom alerting rules Usage alerts and notifications
Data Connectors Custom development required Pre-built integrations available

Cost Analysis

Factor AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
Pricing Model Instance hours + storage Vector storage + operations
Base Cost $15-100+/month (varies by instance) Free (starter tier)
Storage Cost EBS storage rates Included in tier pricing
Query Cost No per-query charges Included in tier pricing
Data Transfer AWS standard rates Included within limits
Hidden Costs Management overhead None (fully managed)

Vector Search Examples

OpenSearch provides comprehensive vector search capabilities with support for multiple algorithms, hybrid search, and flexible configuration options. For detailed implementation examples, index configuration, and advanced search patterns, see the OpenSearch Technical Guide.

Pinecone Vector Search: Step-by-Step Deep Dive

Note: This section contains programming code. If you're not familiar with coding, feel free to skip to the next section!

What Are We Building?

We're creating a smart document search system that finds documents based on meaning rather than exact word matches. Think of it as building the search engine that powers modern AI assistants.

Step 1: Setting Up Pinecone (Getting Started)

import pinecone

# Initialize Pinecone - like logging into your account
pinecone.init(
    api_key="your-api-key",           # Your secret key to access Pinecone
    environment="us-west1-gcp"        # Where your data will be stored (Google Cloud, West Coast)
)

🤓 What's Happening:

  • api_key: Your unique identifier and password combined
  • environment: Physical location of servers (affects speed for users in different regions)

Step 2: Creating an Index (Setting Up Your Search Database)

# Create index - like creating a specialized database for vectors
pinecone.create_index(
    name="vector-search-index",       # What you'll call this database
    dimension=768,                    # Each vector has 768 numbers (matches most AI models)
    metric="cosine",                  # How to measure similarity (cosine = angle between vectors)
    pods=1,                           # Number of computing units (more = faster but more expensive)
    replicas=1,                       # Number of backup copies (more = more reliable)
    pod_type="p1.x1"                  # Size/power of each computing unit
)

# Connect to the index you just created
index = pinecone.Index("vector-search-index")

🤓 What's Really Happening:

  • dimension=768: This matches the output of popular AI models like sentence-transformers
  • metric="cosine": Measures similarity by angle, not distance (perfect for text meaning)
  • pods: Think of these like individual search engines working together
  • replicas: Backup copies in case one fails (1 = no backups, 2 = one backup, etc.)

Step 3: Adding Documents (Uploading Your Data)

# Upsert vectors - "upsert" = update if exists, insert if new
index.upsert(vectors=[
    {
        "id": "doc1",                                    # Unique identifier for this document
        "values": [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ..., 0.8],           # The vector (768 numbers representing meaning)
        "metadata": {                                    # Additional information about the document
            "category": "tech", 
            "source": "blog",
            "title": "Introduction to Machine Learning",
            "author": "Jane Smith"
        }
    },
    {
        "id": "doc2",
        "values": [0.2, -0.1, 0.5, ..., 0.3],
        "metadata": {
            "category": "health",
            "source": "journal",
            "title": "Benefits of Regular Exercise",
            "author": "Dr. Johnson"
        }
    }
])

🤓 What's Really Happening:

  1. id: Like a library catalog number - unique for each document
  2. values: The mathematical representation of the document's meaning (768 decimal numbers)
  3. metadata: Human-readable information you can filter and display
  4. upsert: If "doc1" already exists, it updates it; if not, it creates it

Real Example:

If your document says "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog," the AI model converts this to a vector like [0.15, -0.23, 0.87, 0.12, ..., 0.45] that mathematically represents its meaning.

Step 4: Basic Search (Finding Similar Documents)

# Vector similarity search - find documents similar to your query
results = index.query(
    vector=[0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ..., 0.8],        # Your search query as a vector
    top_k=10,                                 # Return top 10 most similar documents
    include_metadata=True,                    # Include the human-readable info
    filter={"category": {"$eq": "tech"}}      # Only search in "tech" category
)

# Print the results
for match in results.matches:
    print(f"Document: {match.id}")
    print(f"Similarity Score: {match.score}")  # How similar it is (0.0 to 1.0)
    print(f"Title: {match.metadata['title']}")
    print("---")

🤓 What's Really Happening:

  1. Convert your search question to a vector (same 768 numbers format)
  2. Pinecone compares your search vector to all document vectors
  3. Returns the most mathematically similar documents
  4. filter: Only looks at documents matching your criteria

Real Example:

  • You search: "artificial intelligence tutorials"
  • Gets converted to: [0.22, -0.15, 0.78, ...]
  • Finds documents with similar vectors, might include:
  • "Machine Learning Basics" (high similarity)
  • "Neural Network Guide" (high similarity)
  • "Cooking Recipes" (low similarity, won't appear in top 10)

Step 5: Advanced Batch Operations (Enterprise-Level Usage)

# Batch query - search with multiple vectors at once (more efficient)
query_vectors = [
    [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, ..., 0.8],     # Query 1: "machine learning"
    [0.2, -0.1, 0.5, ..., 0.3],    # Query 2: "data science"
    [0.3, 0.4, -0.2, ..., 0.1]     # Query 3: "artificial intelligence"
]

# Process all queries in one request
for i, query_vector in enumerate(query_vectors):
    results = index.query(
        vector=query_vector,
        top_k=5,                              # Get top 5 for each query
        namespace="production",               # Use production data (vs. test data)
        include_values=False,                 # Don't return the actual vectors (saves bandwidth)
        include_metadata=True
    )

    print(f"Results for Query {i+1}:")
    for match in results.matches:
        print(f"  - {match.metadata.get('title', 'No Title')} (Score: {match.score:.3f})")

🤓 Advanced Concepts:

  • namespace: Like having separate folders - "production" vs "test" vs "development"
  • include_values=False: Saves network bandwidth by not returning the actual vectors
  • Batch processing: More efficient than individual queries for multiple searches

Real-World Production Example: E-learning Platform

Here's how you might build search for an online learning platform:

# Setup for educational content search
import pinecone
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

# Initialize embedding model (converts text to vectors)
model = SentenceTransformer('all-MiniLM-L6-v2')  # 384 dimensions, good for general text

# Initialize Pinecone
pinecone.init(api_key="your-key", environment="us-west1-gcp")

# Create index optimized for educational content
pinecone.create_index(
    name="education-search",
    dimension=384,                    # Matches our model output
    metric="cosine",                  # Good for text similarity
    pods=2,                           # More power for faster searches
    replicas=2,                       # High availability
    pod_type="p1.x2"                  # Larger pods for better performance
)

index = pinecone.Index("education-search")

# Function to add educational content
def add_course_content(courses):
    vectors_to_upsert = []

    for course in courses:
        # Convert course description to vector
        description_vector = model.encode(course['description']).tolist()

        vectors_to_upsert.append({
            'id': f"course_{course['id']}",
            'values': description_vector,
            'metadata': {
                'title': course['title'],
                'instructor': course['instructor'],
                'difficulty': course['difficulty'],
                'duration': course['duration'],
                'category': course['category'],
                'rating': course['rating']
            }
        })

    # Upload in batch for efficiency
    index.upsert(vectors=vectors_to_upsert)

# Function to search for courses
def search_courses(search_query, difficulty_level=None, min_rating=None):
    # Convert search query to vector
    query_vector = model.encode(search_query).tolist()

    # Build filter conditions
    filter_conditions = {}
    if difficulty_level:
        filter_conditions['difficulty'] = {'$eq': difficulty_level}
    if min_rating:
        filter_conditions['rating'] = {'$gte': min_rating}

    # Search
    results = index.query(
        vector=query_vector,
        top_k=10,
        include_metadata=True,
        filter=filter_conditions if filter_conditions else None
    )

    # Format results
    courses = []
    for match in results.matches:
        courses.append({
            'title': match.metadata['title'],
            'instructor': match.metadata['instructor'],
            'similarity_score': match.score,
            'difficulty': match.metadata['difficulty'],
            'rating': match.metadata['rating']
        })

    return courses

# Example usage
sample_courses = [
    {
        'id': 1,
        'title': 'Introduction to Python Programming',
        'description': 'Learn Python basics, variables, loops, functions, and object-oriented programming',
        'instructor': 'Dr. Sarah Johnson',
        'difficulty': 'beginner',
        'duration': '40 hours',
        'category': 'programming',
        'rating': 4.8
    },
    {
        'id': 2,
        'title': 'Advanced Machine Learning Techniques',
        'description': 'Deep dive into neural networks, ensemble methods, and advanced ML algorithms',
        'instructor': 'Prof. Michael Chen',
        'difficulty': 'advanced',
        'duration': '60 hours',
        'category': 'ai',
        'rating': 4.9
    }
]

# Add courses to the search index
add_course_content(sample_courses)

# Search examples
beginner_python_courses = search_courses("learn programming basics", difficulty_level="beginner")
advanced_ai_courses = search_courses("machine learning neural networks", min_rating=4.5)

🤓 What This Production Example Shows:

  1. Real embedding model: Uses sentence-transformers to convert text to vectors
  2. Batch operations: Efficiently handles multiple courses at once
  3. Complex filtering: Combines similarity search with difficulty and rating filters
  4. Production considerations: Higher pod count and replicas for reliability
  5. Structured approach: Separate functions for adding content and searching

This is how you'd actually implement vector search in a real application!

Index Design and Optimization

OpenSearch Index Design

For comprehensive OpenSearch index design patterns, configuration options, and optimization strategies, see the OpenSearch Technical Guide.

Pinecone Index Configuration

# Performance optimized configuration
pinecone.create_index(
    name="high-performance-index",
    dimension=768,
    metric="cosine",
    pods=4,                    # Horizontal scaling
    replicas=2,                # High availability
    pod_type="p1.x2",         # Higher performance pods
    shards=2,                  # Data sharding
    metadata_config={
        "indexed": ["category", "timestamp"]  # Index specific metadata fields
    }
)

# Cost optimized configuration
pinecone.create_index(
    name="cost-optimized-index",
    dimension=384,             # Lower dimensions = lower cost
    metric="cosine",
    pods=1,
    replicas=1,
    pod_type="p1.x1",         # Basic performance tier
    metadata_config={
        "indexed": ["category"]  # Minimal metadata indexing
    }
)

Embedding Management Strategies

OpenSearch Embedding Management

OpenSearch provides full control over embedding generation pipelines with support for multiple embedding versions and custom preprocessing. For detailed embedding management strategies and implementation examples, see the OpenSearch Technical Guide.

Pinecone Embedding Management

Advantages:

  • Simplified integration with popular embedding models
  • Built-in support for sparse-dense hybrid vectors
  • Automatic handling of embedding updates
  • Integrated with popular ML frameworks

Considerations:

  • Less flexibility in embedding pipeline customization
  • Vendor dependence for certain optimizations
  • Need to manage embedding generation separately

Advanced Vector Search Algorithms

OpenSearch Algorithms

OpenSearch supports multiple vector search algorithms including HNSW, IVF, and flat search. For detailed algorithm comparisons, parameter tuning, and selection guidance, see the Index Deep Dive.

Pinecone Algorithms

Pinecone uses proprietary algorithms optimized for different scenarios:

  • Standard: Balanced performance for most use cases
  • High Performance: Optimized for low latency
  • High Memory: Better recall for complex similarity patterns

Similarity Metrics Comparison

Metric OpenSearch Pinecone Best Use Case
Cosine Similarity ✅ Default ✅ Recommended Normalized vectors, text embeddings
Euclidean Distance (L2) ✅ L2 space ✅ Available Computer vision, spatial data
Inner Product ✅ Available ✅ Dot product Recommendation systems
Hamming Distance ❌ Not supported ❌ Not supported Binary vectors
Manhattan Distance ❌ Not supported ❌ Not supported Sparse vectors

Multi-tenancy and Isolation

OpenSearch Multi-tenancy

# Index per tenant approach
PUT /tenant-a-vectors
PUT /tenant-b-vectors

# Field-based isolation
{
  "query": {
    "bool": {
      "must": [
        {"knn": {"vector_field": {"vector": [...], "k": 10}}},
        {"term": {"tenant_id": "tenant-a"}}
      ]
    }
  }
}

Pinecone Multi-tenancy

# Namespace-based isolation
index = pinecone.Index("shared-index")

# Tenant A operations
index.upsert(
    vectors=[...],
    namespace="tenant-a"
)

results = index.query(
    vector=[...],
    namespace="tenant-a",
    top_k=10
)

# Metadata-based filtering
results = index.query(
    vector=[...],
    filter={"tenant_id": {"$eq": "tenant-a"}},
    top_k=10
)

Security and Compliance

Feature AWS OpenSearch Pinecone
Data Encryption At rest and in transit At rest and in transit
Network Security VPC, security groups TLS, private endpoints
Access Control Fine-grained IAM roles API keys, SAML SSO
Audit Logging CloudTrail integration Built-in audit logs
Compliance SOC, HIPAA, PCI DSS SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR
Data Residency AWS region control Limited region options

Migration and Data Portability

From OpenSearch to Pinecone

# Export from OpenSearch
def export_from_opensearch(es_client, index_name):
    vectors = []
    scroll = es_client.search(
        index=index_name,
        scroll='2m',
        size=1000,
        body={"query": {"match_all": {}}}
    )

    while len(scroll['hits']['hits']) > 0:
        for doc in scroll['hits']['hits']:
            vectors.append({
                'id': doc['_id'],
                'values': doc['_source']['vector_field'],
                'metadata': doc['_source'].get('metadata', {})
            })

        scroll = es_client.scroll(
            scroll_id=scroll['_scroll_id'],
            scroll='2m'
        )

    return vectors

# Import to Pinecone
def import_to_pinecone(index, vectors, batch_size=100):
    for i in range(0, len(vectors), batch_size):
        batch = vectors[i:i + batch_size]
        index.upsert(vectors=batch)

From Pinecone to OpenSearch

# Export from Pinecone
def export_from_pinecone(index, namespace=None):
    # Note: Pinecone doesn't provide direct export functionality
    # This requires querying with dummy vectors to retrieve data
    pass

# Import to OpenSearch
def import_to_opensearch(es_client, index_name, vectors):
    from elasticsearch.helpers import bulk

    def doc_generator():
        for vector in vectors:
            yield {
                '_index': index_name,
                '_id': vector['id'],
                '_source': {
                    'vector_field': vector['values'],
                    'metadata': vector.get('metadata', {})
                }
            }

    bulk(es_client, doc_generator())

Monitoring and Observability

OpenSearch Monitoring

  • Metrics: Cluster health, indexing rate, query latency
  • Tools: CloudWatch, Kibana dashboards, custom monitoring
  • Alerting: Based on performance thresholds, error rates
  • Debugging: Detailed query profiling, slow query logs

Pinecone Monitoring

  • Metrics: Query count, latency, index utilization
  • Tools: Built-in dashboard, API metrics
  • Alerting: Usage limits, performance degradation
  • Debugging: Limited query profiling capabilities

RAG Implementation Comparison

OpenSearch for RAG

Advantages: - Complete RAG ecosystem: Full-text search, vector search, hybrid retrieval, and reranking in one platform - Flexible architecture: Support for basic RAG, advanced multi-step retrieval, conversational RAG, and agentic patterns - Multi-modal capabilities: Handle text, images, and multimedia content in unified RAG systems - Production features: Built-in security, monitoring, scaling, and operational tools - Custom workflows: Full control over retrieval strategies, filtering, and generation pipelines

Implementation Examples: For comprehensive RAG implementation patterns, architectures, and production examples, see the OpenSearch RAG Guide.

Best for RAG when: - Building enterprise RAG systems requiring security and compliance - Need hybrid retrieval combining keyword and semantic search - Implementing complex multi-step or conversational RAG patterns - Working with diverse content types and metadata - Require full control over RAG pipeline optimization

Pinecone for RAG

Advantages: - Specialized vector retrieval: Optimized specifically for high-performance vector similarity search - Simple integration: Easy to incorporate into existing RAG frameworks and ML pipelines - Zero maintenance: Managed service handles all infrastructure and optimization - High performance: Consistent low-latency vector retrieval at scale - ML ecosystem integration: Native support for popular RAG frameworks

Best for RAG when: - Vector similarity is the primary retrieval mechanism - Building RAG systems with external orchestration (LangChain, LlamaIndex) - Need rapid prototyping and deployment - Working with pure embedding-based retrieval - Team focuses on application logic rather than search infrastructure

RAG Architecture Patterns

OpenSearch RAG Architecture: 

User Query → Query Processing → Hybrid Search (Text + Vector) →
Reranking → Context Assembly → LLM Generation → Response + Sources

Pinecone RAG Architecture: 

User Query → Embedding → Vector Search → External Reranking →
Context Assembly → LLM Generation → Response + Sources

RAG Performance Comparison

RAG Aspect OpenSearch Pinecone
Retrieval Latency 10-100ms (configurable) Sub-10ms typical
Hybrid Search Native support Requires external text search
Reranking Built-in rescoring External implementation
Context Assembly Flexible document handling Vector + metadata only
Scalability Manual scaling required Automatic scaling
Operational Complexity High (full search platform) Low (managed vector service)

Use Case Recommendations

Choose OpenSearch When:

  • Building comprehensive RAG systems with diverse retrieval needs
  • Need both vector and traditional search capabilities
  • Require complex filtering and aggregations
  • Have existing Elasticsearch/OpenSearch expertise
  • Need fine-grained control over infrastructure
  • Working with structured data beyond vectors
  • Need cost optimization for large-scale deployments
  • Require on-premises or hybrid deployment options
  • Implementing enterprise RAG with security and compliance requirements

Choose Pinecone When:

  • Building RAG systems focused primarily on vector similarity search
  • Want zero-maintenance managed service for vector retrieval
  • Need rapid prototyping and deployment
  • Working primarily with ML/AI applications
  • Require automatic scaling and optimization
  • Team lacks search infrastructure expertise
  • Need reliable SLA guarantees for vector operations
  • Working with embedding-centric RAG workflows
  • Using RAG frameworks that handle text search separately

Performance Optimization Best Practices

OpenSearch Optimization

  1. Hardware Configuration
  2. Use memory-optimized instances (r5, r6i)
  3. SSD storage for vector indices

  4. Sufficient RAM for vector operations

  5. Index Configuration 

    {
  "settings": {
    "index.refresh_interval": "30s",
    "index.knn.algo_param.ef_search": 100,
    "index.translog.durability": "async"
  }
}

  6. Query Optimization

  7. Use appropriate k values
  8. Implement result caching
  9. Optimize filter queries

Pinecone Optimization

  1. Index Configuration 

    # Optimize for latency
index = pinecone.create_index(
    name="optimized-index",
    dimension=768,
    pods=4,
    pod_type="p1.x2",
    replicas=2
)

  2. Query Optimization

  3. Use appropriate metadata indexing
  4. Batch queries when possible
  5. Implement client-side caching

Conclusion

The choice between OpenSearch and Pinecone depends largely on your specific requirements and constraints. OpenSearch offers more flexibility and control, making it suitable for complex search scenarios that go beyond pure vector similarity. Pinecone excels in pure vector search use cases where simplicity, performance, and managed service benefits outweigh the need for customization.

See important disclaimers.